https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209878 The Tribunal upheld the decision to set aside the penalty imposed by the Revenue, emphasizing the appellant's transparency in informing authorities about goods clearance issues. The liability for special excise duty and NCCD was not extensively discussed as the appeal primarily focused on the penalty under Section 11AC. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's appeal, stating no suppression of facts and insufficient grounds for penalty imposition. en-us Tue, 03 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Jul 2013 16:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209878 The Tribunal upheld the decision to set aside the penalty imposed by the Revenue, emphasizing the appellant's transparency in informing authorities about goods clearance issues. The liability for special excise duty and NCCD was not extensively discussed as the appeal primarily focused on the penalty under Section 11AC. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's appeal, stating no suppression of facts and insufficient grounds for penalty imposition. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 03 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209878