<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 510 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209875</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the addition of excessive wastage of newspaper and to allow the expenditure claimed by the assessee. The judgment emphasizes the importance of maintaining accurate records and providing justifications for expenses, highlighting the need for a case-specific approach rather than a blanket application of standard rates or practices.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 09:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183319" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 510 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209875</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the addition of excessive wastage of newspaper and to allow the expenditure claimed by the assessee. The judgment emphasizes the importance of maintaining accurate records and providing justifications for expenses, highlighting the need for a case-specific approach rather than a blanket application of standard rates or practices.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209875</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>