<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 507 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209872</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the addition made by the Assessing Officer on account of notional interest on the interest-free security deposit while determining the Annual Letting Value (ALV) under section 23(1)(a) was not permissible. The matter was remanded back to the Assessing Officer for re-determination in accordance with the Full Bench decision of the Hon&#039;ble Delhi High Court. The appeals filed by the revenue were allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 17:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183316" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 507 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209872</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the addition made by the Assessing Officer on account of notional interest on the interest-free security deposit while determining the Annual Letting Value (ALV) under section 23(1)(a) was not permissible. The matter was remanded back to the Assessing Officer for re-determination in accordance with the Full Bench decision of the Hon&#039;ble Delhi High Court. The appeals filed by the revenue were allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209872</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>