<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 855 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209853</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the application of Section 50C to the transfer of development rights, rejected the higher valuation of land proposed by the assessee, and dismissed the argument regarding the tax liability discrepancy between co-owners due to lack of evidence. The Tribunal directed the AO to reconsider the indexation of the building cost in the computation of long-term capital gains. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 10:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183297" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 855 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209853</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the application of Section 50C to the transfer of development rights, rejected the higher valuation of land proposed by the assessee, and dismissed the argument regarding the tax liability discrepancy between co-owners due to lack of evidence. The Tribunal directed the AO to reconsider the indexation of the building cost in the computation of long-term capital gains. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209853</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>