<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 844 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209842</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition challenging the notice directing the reversal of Cenvat Credit and payment of interest, setting aside the order due to a violation of natural justice. The matter was remitted for a fresh decision with the petitioner given an opportunity to show cause. The court also directed a different Assistant Commissioner to conduct the enquiry for fairness and stayed an internal communication pending completion of the enquiry.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 11:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183286" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 844 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209842</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition challenging the notice directing the reversal of Cenvat Credit and payment of interest, setting aside the order due to a violation of natural justice. The matter was remitted for a fresh decision with the petitioner given an opportunity to show cause. The court also directed a different Assistant Commissioner to conduct the enquiry for fairness and stayed an internal communication pending completion of the enquiry.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209842</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>