<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 835 - CESTAT, AHEMDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209833</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that cenvat credit on service tax paid for outward transportation of exported goods was admissible up to the port of export, considering the place of removal in export cases. Relying on legal precedents and the definition of input services, the Tribunal found in favor of the assessee, allowing the credit claimed by M/s. Kanoria Chemicals and Industries Ltd. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected, leading to the dismissal of issues related to limitation, penalty imposition, and interest recovery.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 12:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183277" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 835 - CESTAT, AHEMDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209833</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that cenvat credit on service tax paid for outward transportation of exported goods was admissible up to the port of export, considering the place of removal in export cases. Relying on legal precedents and the definition of input services, the Tribunal found in favor of the assessee, allowing the credit claimed by M/s. Kanoria Chemicals and Industries Ltd. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected, leading to the dismissal of issues related to limitation, penalty imposition, and interest recovery.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209833</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>