<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 821 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209819</link>
    <description>Input service credit on outdoor catering service was held admissible where the assessee did not recover any amount from employees and the cost of food formed part of the assessable value. The controlling principle applied was that welfare-oriented catering services can qualify for credit when the expense is embedded in business valuation and there is no employee recovery. On those facts, the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed and the earlier orders allowing credit were affirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 16:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183263" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 821 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209819</link>
      <description>Input service credit on outdoor catering service was held admissible where the assessee did not recover any amount from employees and the cost of food formed part of the assessable value. The controlling principle applied was that welfare-oriented catering services can qualify for credit when the expense is embedded in business valuation and there is no employee recovery. On those facts, the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed and the earlier orders allowing credit were affirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209819</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>