<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 819 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209817</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by setting aside the impugned order and directing the Commissioner (Appeals) to verify the actual date of receipt of the Order-In-Original (OIO). If the claim was verified, the Commissioner was instructed to proceed on merits, ensuring adherence to the Principles of Natural Justice. The appeal was allowed by way of remand for further proceedings, considering the appellant&#039;s timely filing based on the corrected date of receipt of the OIO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 16:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183261" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 819 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209817</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by setting aside the impugned order and directing the Commissioner (Appeals) to verify the actual date of receipt of the Order-In-Original (OIO). If the claim was verified, the Commissioner was instructed to proceed on merits, ensuring adherence to the Principles of Natural Justice. The appeal was allowed by way of remand for further proceedings, considering the appellant&#039;s timely filing based on the corrected date of receipt of the OIO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209817</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>