<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 786 - ITAT, Delhi</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209784</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT (Appeals) decisions on all issues, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The disallowance of recruitment and training expenses was deleted as revenue expenditure facilitating business operations. Sales promotion expenses disallowance was overturned due to lack of evidence against business purposes. Depreciation on computers was allowed at 60%, following precedents. The judgment stressed adherence to legal precedents, consistency, and distinguishing revenue from capital expenditures for deductions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 16:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183228" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 786 - ITAT, Delhi</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209784</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT (Appeals) decisions on all issues, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The disallowance of recruitment and training expenses was deleted as revenue expenditure facilitating business operations. Sales promotion expenses disallowance was overturned due to lack of evidence against business purposes. Depreciation on computers was allowed at 60%, following precedents. The judgment stressed adherence to legal precedents, consistency, and distinguishing revenue from capital expenditures for deductions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209784</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>