<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1353 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209780</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the appeal, ruling in favor of the Revenue, holding that the remuneration payable to Shebaits should not be treated as an annual charge on the property under section 24(1)(iv) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court found no merit in the appellant&#039;s argument and denied the deduction claimed, ultimately dismissing the appeal with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2013 15:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183224" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1353 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209780</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the appeal, ruling in favor of the Revenue, holding that the remuneration payable to Shebaits should not be treated as an annual charge on the property under section 24(1)(iv) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court found no merit in the appellant&#039;s argument and denied the deduction claimed, ultimately dismissing the appeal with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209780</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>