<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (12) TMI 228 - ITAT, Bangalore</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209770</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and deleting the addition made by the AO. The Annual Letting Value (ALV) of the vacant properties was deemed NIL under section 23(1)(c), as the properties were held with the intention to let out but remained vacant. The Tribunal also ordered a recalculation of interest under sections 234B and 234C based on the revised income assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2016 17:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183214" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (12) TMI 228 - ITAT, Bangalore</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209770</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and deleting the addition made by the AO. The Annual Letting Value (ALV) of the vacant properties was deemed NIL under section 23(1)(c), as the properties were held with the intention to let out but remained vacant. The Tribunal also ordered a recalculation of interest under sections 234B and 234C based on the revised income assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209770</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>