<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (12) TMI 225 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209767</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the assessee&#039;s transfer pricing report, deleted the adjustments made by the DRP, and allowed the appeal. The ITAT emphasized the importance of consistency, proper comparability analysis, and adjustments for depreciation and technical knowhow fees. The assessee&#039;s approach was found to be justified and in line with the arm&#039;s length principle.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 11:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183211" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (12) TMI 225 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209767</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the assessee&#039;s transfer pricing report, deleted the adjustments made by the DRP, and allowed the appeal. The ITAT emphasized the importance of consistency, proper comparability analysis, and adjustments for depreciation and technical knowhow fees. The assessee&#039;s approach was found to be justified and in line with the arm&#039;s length principle.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209767</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>