<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (2) TMI 79 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209745</link>
    <description>The Court directed the respondents to release the goods upon the petitioner paying 30% of the differential duty and furnishing a personal bond. The Division Bench confirmed a previous order for release upon payment of 50% differential duty. The validity of the contract for importing apples was upheld, and the assessing authority was directed to conclude the assessment within eight weeks. No costs were imposed on either party.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183189" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (2) TMI 79 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209745</link>
      <description>The Court directed the respondents to release the goods upon the petitioner paying 30% of the differential duty and furnishing a personal bond. The Division Bench confirmed a previous order for release upon payment of 50% differential duty. The validity of the contract for importing apples was upheld, and the assessing authority was directed to conclude the assessment within eight weeks. No costs were imposed on either party.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209745</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>