<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (2) TMI 76 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209734</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the request for appointing independent persons to monitor the &#039;2G case&#039; investigation, citing satisfaction with the ongoing investigation by the CBI and other agencies. Instead, the Court directed the Central Vigilance Commissioner and Senior Vigilance Commissioner to assist in monitoring, aligning with the Central Vigilance Commission Act, 2003. The Court&#039;s decision did not question the integrity or competence of the ongoing investigation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 10:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183178" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (2) TMI 76 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209734</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the request for appointing independent persons to monitor the &#039;2G case&#039; investigation, citing satisfaction with the ongoing investigation by the CBI and other agencies. Instead, the Court directed the Central Vigilance Commissioner and Senior Vigilance Commissioner to assist in monitoring, aligning with the Central Vigilance Commission Act, 2003. The Court&#039;s decision did not question the integrity or competence of the ongoing investigation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209734</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>