https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209734 The Court explained that supervisory powers under the Central Vigilance Commission Act, read with earlier corruption-monitoring directions, allow assistance in monitoring an investigation but do not permit direction of the investigating agency to proceed in a particular manner. Because the investigation was progressing satisfactorily, the Court found no need to appoint independent outside persons to scrutinise the probe. Given the sensitivity of the matter and the large number of persons involved, the Court considered it appropriate to seek assistance from the Central Vigilance Commissioner and the Senior Vigilance Commissioner for effective monitoring. en-us Thu, 02 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 11 Feb 2012 10:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209734 The Court explained that supervisory powers under the Central Vigilance Commission Act, read with earlier corruption-monitoring directions, allow assistance in monitoring an investigation but do not permit direction of the investigating agency to proceed in a particular manner. Because the investigation was progressing satisfactorily, the Court found no need to appoint independent outside persons to scrutinise the probe. Given the sensitivity of the matter and the large number of persons involved, the Court considered it appropriate to seek assistance from the Central Vigilance Commissioner and the Senior Vigilance Commissioner for effective monitoring. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 02 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209734