<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (2) TMI 65 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209723</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to cancel the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. It was found that the assessee acted in good faith, as supported by a certificate from the Tehsildar, and there was no willful concealment of income. The AO had accepted the revised return with LTCG declared, making the penalty for furnishing inaccurate particulars unjustified. The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal, affirming the cancellation of the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 12:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183167" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (2) TMI 65 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209723</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to cancel the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. It was found that the assessee acted in good faith, as supported by a certificate from the Tehsildar, and there was no willful concealment of income. The AO had accepted the revised return with LTCG declared, making the penalty for furnishing inaccurate particulars unjustified. The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal, affirming the cancellation of the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209723</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>