https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209718 The appeal was allowed as the denial of cenvat credit based on technical grounds without considering service requirements and tax payments was deemed incorrect. The judgment emphasized that the appellant fulfilled all necessary requirements for credit entitlement, highlighting the lack of grounds for suppression of facts. The impugned order was unsustainable on merit and limitation grounds, leading to the allowance of the appeal with consequential relief for the appellants. The importance of reviewing credit availment if proceedings result in a refund entitlement was emphasized to ensure compliance with the law. en-us Tue, 04 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Aug 2013 12:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209718 The appeal was allowed as the denial of cenvat credit based on technical grounds without considering service requirements and tax payments was deemed incorrect. The judgment emphasized that the appellant fulfilled all necessary requirements for credit entitlement, highlighting the lack of grounds for suppression of facts. The impugned order was unsustainable on merit and limitation grounds, leading to the allowance of the appeal with consequential relief for the appellants. The importance of reviewing credit availment if proceedings result in a refund entitlement was emphasized to ensure compliance with the law. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 04 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209718