<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 317 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209717</link>
    <description>Taxability of laying optical fibres turned on whether the activity fell within erection, commissioning and installation services, and a later circular directly clarifying that scope had not been considered in the original adjudication or appeal. Because the circular was relevant to whether the activity was taxable at all, the matter required fresh consideration on a fuller record. The dispute was remanded to the original adjudicating authority for reconsideration, with pre-deposit waived and the taxability issue left open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183161" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 317 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209717</link>
      <description>Taxability of laying optical fibres turned on whether the activity fell within erection, commissioning and installation services, and a later circular directly clarifying that scope had not been considered in the original adjudication or appeal. Because the circular was relevant to whether the activity was taxable at all, the matter required fresh consideration on a fuller record. The dispute was remanded to the original adjudicating authority for reconsideration, with pre-deposit waived and the taxability issue left open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209717</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>