<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 315 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209715</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in this case that arranging vehicle finances on a commission basis by an authorized dealer constitutes business auxiliary services liable to service tax. However, penalties under sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 were deemed unjustified due to confusion in the field and lack of suppression by the assessee. The Tribunal upheld the decision not to impose penalties, emphasizing the bonafide nature of the respondents&#039; actions. Additionally, the Tribunal denied the respondents&#039; request for a refund of the duty and interest deposited, as the confirmation of duty remained unchallenged at any stage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183159" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 315 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209715</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in this case that arranging vehicle finances on a commission basis by an authorized dealer constitutes business auxiliary services liable to service tax. However, penalties under sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 were deemed unjustified due to confusion in the field and lack of suppression by the assessee. The Tribunal upheld the decision not to impose penalties, emphasizing the bonafide nature of the respondents&#039; actions. Additionally, the Tribunal denied the respondents&#039; request for a refund of the duty and interest deposited, as the confirmation of duty remained unchallenged at any stage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209715</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>