<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 505 - Allahabad High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209708</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the revenue, emphasizing that the Tribunal&#039;s misinterpretation of the Cenvat credit reversal and failure to consider the department&#039;s role led to an erroneous decision. The judgment clarified the conditions for penalty imposition under Section 11AC and directed the department to proceed accordingly based on the findings of the Adjudication Officer and the Appellate Authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Dec 2013 12:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183152" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 505 - Allahabad High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209708</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the revenue, emphasizing that the Tribunal&#039;s misinterpretation of the Cenvat credit reversal and failure to consider the department&#039;s role led to an erroneous decision. The judgment clarified the conditions for penalty imposition under Section 11AC and directed the department to proceed accordingly based on the findings of the Adjudication Officer and the Appellate Authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209708</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>