<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 308 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209699</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the charging of interest under Section 234-B of the Income Tax Act. It was held that interest cannot be imposed through a notice of demand without a specific order in the assessment order. The court emphasized that any tax, interest, penalty, or fine must be payable as a result of an order passed under the Act, i.e., the assessment order. It was established that interest must be explicitly mentioned in the assessment order to be recoverable through a notice of demand, aligning the assessment order with the notice of demand. Consequently, the appeal was rejected, and each party was directed to bear their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 15:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183143" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 308 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209699</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the charging of interest under Section 234-B of the Income Tax Act. It was held that interest cannot be imposed through a notice of demand without a specific order in the assessment order. The court emphasized that any tax, interest, penalty, or fine must be payable as a result of an order passed under the Act, i.e., the assessment order. It was established that interest must be explicitly mentioned in the assessment order to be recoverable through a notice of demand, aligning the assessment order with the notice of demand. Consequently, the appeal was rejected, and each party was directed to bear their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209699</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>