<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 498 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209695</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to assess income from the sale of shares under &#039;Capital gains&#039; rather than &#039;Profits and gains of business or profession&#039;. Additionally, the fee paid to the Asset Management Company (ENAM) was deemed allowable as a deduction under section 48 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found the fee to be genuine, necessary for the acquisition and sale of securities, and in compliance with amended SEBI regulations. As a result, the appeals by the companies involved were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 22:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183139" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 498 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209695</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to assess income from the sale of shares under &#039;Capital gains&#039; rather than &#039;Profits and gains of business or profession&#039;. Additionally, the fee paid to the Asset Management Company (ENAM) was deemed allowable as a deduction under section 48 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found the fee to be genuine, necessary for the acquisition and sale of securities, and in compliance with amended SEBI regulations. As a result, the appeals by the companies involved were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209695</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>