<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 497 - ITAT, Mumbai</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209694</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT (A)&#039;s order and directed the AO to request evidence of tax deduction by the other party. While credit for tax deducted at source may not be granted without certificates, the demand should be suspended if satisfactory proof is provided. The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeals for statistical purposes, stressing the importance of evidence of tax deduction to avoid double taxation, even in the absence of TDS certificates.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 15:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183138" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 497 - ITAT, Mumbai</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209694</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT (A)&#039;s order and directed the AO to request evidence of tax deduction by the other party. While credit for tax deducted at source may not be granted without certificates, the demand should be suspended if satisfactory proof is provided. The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeals for statistical purposes, stressing the importance of evidence of tax deduction to avoid double taxation, even in the absence of TDS certificates.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209694</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>