<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 506 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209684</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed one appeal and fully allowed another, confirming tax liability on franchisee services but exempting Abacus training for students and training for teachers from taxation. The penalty for delayed payment was reduced to Rs. 3.5 lakhs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2015 18:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183128" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 506 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209684</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed one appeal and fully allowed another, confirming tax liability on franchisee services but exempting Abacus training for students and training for teachers from taxation. The penalty for delayed payment was reduced to Rs. 3.5 lakhs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209684</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>