<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (12) TMI 209 - Bombay High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209679</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the validity of a notification by the Union Government requiring exporters to certify meat products from registered abattoirs for export quality control. The Court clarified that both meat processing plants and abattoirs must be registered with APEDA. The notification aimed to ensure quality control and hygiene standards in meat exports, emphasizing compliance with APEDA regulations. The Court allowed the petitioner to make representations for setting up integrated abattoirs and transitional arrangements, directing expedited decisions on representations and existing meat stocks. The petition was ultimately dismissed, emphasizing compliance with APEDA regulations for meat exports.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 11:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183123" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (12) TMI 209 - Bombay High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209679</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the validity of a notification by the Union Government requiring exporters to certify meat products from registered abattoirs for export quality control. The Court clarified that both meat processing plants and abattoirs must be registered with APEDA. The notification aimed to ensure quality control and hygiene standards in meat exports, emphasizing compliance with APEDA regulations. The Court allowed the petitioner to make representations for setting up integrated abattoirs and transitional arrangements, directing expedited decisions on representations and existing meat stocks. The petition was ultimately dismissed, emphasizing compliance with APEDA regulations for meat exports.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209679</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>