https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209677 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai rejected the appellants' applications for condonation of delay in filing appeals under Section 129A of the Customs Act. The delay of three months and twenty-one days was attributed to the advocate's request for documents and a company official's resignation. The Tribunal found the reasons provided insufficient, emphasizing the need for a satisfactory day-to-day explanation for delays in appeals. The decision highlighted the importance of adhering to statutory timelines and the requirement for a strong and valid cause for condonation of delay. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed as time-barred. en-us Mon, 11 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Jun 2013 16:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209677 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai rejected the appellants' applications for condonation of delay in filing appeals under Section 129A of the Customs Act. The delay of three months and twenty-one days was attributed to the advocate's request for documents and a company official's resignation. The Tribunal found the reasons provided insufficient, emphasizing the need for a satisfactory day-to-day explanation for delays in appeals. The decision highlighted the importance of adhering to statutory timelines and the requirement for a strong and valid cause for condonation of delay. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed as time-barred. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 11 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209677