<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 724 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209668</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the appellant was not obligated to reverse the CENVAT credit upon converting to a 100% EOU. It was determined that the appellant could lawfully use the credit for duty payments, as there were no restrictions in place during the relevant period. The decision aligned with previous Tribunal rulings and emphasized that the department could not demand credit reversal if it had been utilized appropriately.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183112" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 724 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209668</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the appellant was not obligated to reverse the CENVAT credit upon converting to a 100% EOU. It was determined that the appellant could lawfully use the credit for duty payments, as there were no restrictions in place during the relevant period. The decision aligned with previous Tribunal rulings and emphasized that the department could not demand credit reversal if it had been utilized appropriately.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209668</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>