<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (2) TMI 31 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209665</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai allowed both appeals related to the Assessment Year 2002-03. The first appeal regarding the addition of Rs.75,30,000/- was allowed as there was no basis for the addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The second appeal concerning the cancellation of cheques issued by the assessee was also allowed based on similar reasoning. The ITAT&#039;s analysis led to the deletion of the additions made by the Assessing Officer and the CIT(A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 18:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183109" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (2) TMI 31 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209665</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai allowed both appeals related to the Assessment Year 2002-03. The first appeal regarding the addition of Rs.75,30,000/- was allowed as there was no basis for the addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The second appeal concerning the cancellation of cheques issued by the assessee was also allowed based on similar reasoning. The ITAT&#039;s analysis led to the deletion of the additions made by the Assessing Officer and the CIT(A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209665</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>