<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (2) TMI 29 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209663</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, deciding that the cash compensation received should not be considered taxable income but should be factored into reducing the cost of acquisition of the asset for future capital gains calculation. The judgment emphasized the non-taxability of capital receipts unless specifically provided for in the Income Tax Act, distinguishing them from revenue receipts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 10:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183107" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (2) TMI 29 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209663</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, deciding that the cash compensation received should not be considered taxable income but should be factored into reducing the cost of acquisition of the asset for future capital gains calculation. The judgment emphasized the non-taxability of capital receipts unless specifically provided for in the Income Tax Act, distinguishing them from revenue receipts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209663</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>