<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 490 - ITAT, Bangalore</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209659</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court remanded the case to the Assessing Officer for a detailed field inspection to determine if the income generated by the company from growing and exporting ornamental plants through tissue culture qualifies as agricultural income. The AO is instructed to verify the activities and bifurcate the income based on expenditure incurred on agricultural and non-agricultural operations. Both parties&#039; appeals were set aside for statistical purposes pending verification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 15:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183104" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 490 - ITAT, Bangalore</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209659</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court remanded the case to the Assessing Officer for a detailed field inspection to determine if the income generated by the company from growing and exporting ornamental plants through tissue culture qualifies as agricultural income. The AO is instructed to verify the activities and bifurcate the income based on expenditure incurred on agricultural and non-agricultural operations. Both parties&#039; appeals were set aside for statistical purposes pending verification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209659</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>