<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 1119 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209629</link>
    <description>A second writ petition founded on the same core facts and identical issues as an earlier petition was barred by the applicable court rule prohibiting a fresh application on identical facts. As the subsequent petition repeated the earlier challenge, it could not be entertained. The writ was dismissed at the threshold for non-maintainability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2013 16:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183075" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 1119 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209629</link>
      <description>A second writ petition founded on the same core facts and identical issues as an earlier petition was barred by the applicable court rule prohibiting a fresh application on identical facts. As the subsequent petition repeated the earlier challenge, it could not be entertained. The writ was dismissed at the threshold for non-maintainability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209629</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>