<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1338 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209622</link>
    <description>The Court emphasized the discretionary power of the proper officer in granting provisional assessment under Section 18 of the Customs Act, 1962. The appellants&#039; request for provisional assessment was denied, leading to a Writ Petition. The Court clarified that provisional assessment is not a right but an exception to final assessment, subject to specific conditions. The judgment highlighted the importance of proper security, such as Bank Guarantees, to ensure duty recoverability. The Writ Appeal was disposed of by modifying the Single Judge&#039;s judgment, emphasizing the officer&#039;s discretion and the necessity of compliance with legal provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2015 18:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183068" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1338 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209622</link>
      <description>The Court emphasized the discretionary power of the proper officer in granting provisional assessment under Section 18 of the Customs Act, 1962. The appellants&#039; request for provisional assessment was denied, leading to a Writ Petition. The Court clarified that provisional assessment is not a right but an exception to final assessment, subject to specific conditions. The judgment highlighted the importance of proper security, such as Bank Guarantees, to ensure duty recoverability. The Writ Appeal was disposed of by modifying the Single Judge&#039;s judgment, emphasizing the officer&#039;s discretion and the necessity of compliance with legal provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209622</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>