<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 1189 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209612</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the appeals, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s orders and restoring the matters to the Tribunal to consider the eligibility of the respondent assessees for benefits under Section 80HHC. The Assessing Officer had denied the proviso&#039;s benefit introduced by the Finance Act, 2005, with retrospective effect from 01/04/1998. The High Court emphasized that the issue was on eligibility, not computation, and found in favor of the assessees, directing a reevaluation of their eligibility for the deduction. Additionally, the High Court dismissed the appeal on the issue of expenditure on bonus shares following a Supreme Court decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jul 2013 09:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183058" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 1189 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209612</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the appeals, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s orders and restoring the matters to the Tribunal to consider the eligibility of the respondent assessees for benefits under Section 80HHC. The Assessing Officer had denied the proviso&#039;s benefit introduced by the Finance Act, 2005, with retrospective effect from 01/04/1998. The High Court emphasized that the issue was on eligibility, not computation, and found in favor of the assessees, directing a reevaluation of their eligibility for the deduction. Additionally, the High Court dismissed the appeal on the issue of expenditure on bonus shares following a Supreme Court decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209612</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>