<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 1103 - Karnataka High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209588</link>
    <description>Section 10B, as it stood before the Finance Act, 1994 amendment, granted exemption to a hundred per cent export-oriented undertaking approved by the prescribed authority without requiring that 75 per cent of turnover be exported. The later amendment and Circular No. 684 imposed the commencement and export-percentage conditions prospectively from 1 April 1994, so earlier units were not covered by the new restriction. On that construction, an undertaking that began production before 1 April 1994 remained eligible for exemption despite exports below 75 per cent of turnover, and the disallowance by the Assessing Officer was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jul 2013 12:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183035" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 1103 - Karnataka High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209588</link>
      <description>Section 10B, as it stood before the Finance Act, 1994 amendment, granted exemption to a hundred per cent export-oriented undertaking approved by the prescribed authority without requiring that 75 per cent of turnover be exported. The later amendment and Circular No. 684 imposed the commencement and export-percentage conditions prospectively from 1 April 1994, so earlier units were not covered by the new restriction. On that construction, an undertaking that began production before 1 April 1994 remained eligible for exemption despite exports below 75 per cent of turnover, and the disallowance by the Assessing Officer was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209588</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>