<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 1027 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209575</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by M/s. ABB Limited, setting aside the demand for differential duty, interest, and penalty. The order of confiscation and fine of Rs. 40 Crores was vacated due to the absence of statutory provisions to determine Retail Sale Price (RSP) for the imported goods in question. The appeal was pronounced on 21-12-2010.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jul 2013 12:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183022" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 1027 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209575</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by M/s. ABB Limited, setting aside the demand for differential duty, interest, and penalty. The order of confiscation and fine of Rs. 40 Crores was vacated due to the absence of statutory provisions to determine Retail Sale Price (RSP) for the imported goods in question. The appeal was pronounced on 21-12-2010.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209575</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>