https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209567 The Government upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)' decision to allow remission of duty under Rule 21 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, for a manufacturer who suffered a loss of sugar due to a fire incident. Despite initial rejection by the Assistant Commissioner, the Government found the fire to be the primary cause of the loss, justifying the remission claim. The application's argument against the applicability of cited case laws was dismissed, and the procedural requirements for remission were deemed to have been met. The revision application was ultimately dismissed for lack of merit. en-us Fri, 24 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 15 Jul 2013 14:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209567 The Government upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)' decision to allow remission of duty under Rule 21 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, for a manufacturer who suffered a loss of sugar due to a fire incident. Despite initial rejection by the Assistant Commissioner, the Government found the fire to be the primary cause of the loss, justifying the remission claim. The application's argument against the applicability of cited case laws was dismissed, and the procedural requirements for remission were deemed to have been met. The revision application was ultimately dismissed for lack of merit. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 24 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209567