<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1310 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209564</link>
    <description>The court set aside the Settlement Commission&#039;s order, finding that it erred in disregarding the investigation report and incorrectly concluding that the petitioner made inconsistent disclosures. The matter was remitted for reconsideration based on the evidence and investigation report. The writ petition was allowed, and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2013 14:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183011" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1310 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209564</link>
      <description>The court set aside the Settlement Commission&#039;s order, finding that it erred in disregarding the investigation report and incorrectly concluding that the petitioner made inconsistent disclosures. The matter was remitted for reconsideration based on the evidence and investigation report. The writ petition was allowed, and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209564</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>