<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 1172 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209545</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to set aside the suspension of the CHA license, finding no substantial question of law and dismissing the appeals. The civil applications for stay were also disposed of as infructuous. The Court emphasized the lack of specific details in the Commissioner&#039;s orders regarding fraudulent documents and refund claims, and highlighted the respondent&#039;s consistent defense that files were handled with Customs officers&#039; consent, which was not investigated by the Commissioner. The Court concluded that the appellant failed to establish any misconduct by the respondent or their employee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2013 11:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182992" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 1172 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209545</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to set aside the suspension of the CHA license, finding no substantial question of law and dismissing the appeals. The civil applications for stay were also disposed of as infructuous. The Court emphasized the lack of specific details in the Commissioner&#039;s orders regarding fraudulent documents and refund claims, and highlighted the respondent&#039;s consistent defense that files were handled with Customs officers&#039; consent, which was not investigated by the Commissioner. The Court concluded that the appellant failed to establish any misconduct by the respondent or their employee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209545</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>