https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209533 The Tribunal upheld the confirmation of cenvat credit demand against the Appellant, a manufacturer of bathroom fittings, based on discrepancies found in invoices issued by M/s. Sulabh Impex Corporation. Penalties were imposed on the Appellant, Shri Sunil Dutt, and the corporation. The Tribunal affirmed the duty demand and penalties, except for setting aside the penalty under Rule 25 and reducing the penalty under Section 11AC to 25% of the cenvat credit demand due to early payment, following a relevant court judgment. en-us Tue, 01 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 Jul 2013 13:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209533 The Tribunal upheld the confirmation of cenvat credit demand against the Appellant, a manufacturer of bathroom fittings, based on discrepancies found in invoices issued by M/s. Sulabh Impex Corporation. Penalties were imposed on the Appellant, Shri Sunil Dutt, and the corporation. The Tribunal affirmed the duty demand and penalties, except for setting aside the penalty under Rule 25 and reducing the penalty under Section 11AC to 25% of the cenvat credit demand due to early payment, following a relevant court judgment. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 01 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209533