<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1297 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209530</link>
    <description>Duty-free imported parts received for job work could be re-exported even though the foreign supplier no longer required the work and some of the goods had already been used in manufacture of sub-assemblies. Although the specific notification condition for re-export of defective or unfit materials was not strictly met, the Foreign Trade Policy allowed re-export of imported goods where no import or export restriction applied, and the goods were not shown to be restricted. Re-export could not be denied merely because the goods were partially used, provided the balance goods were properly identified as the same imported goods. The rejection of re-export was therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2013 13:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182977" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1297 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209530</link>
      <description>Duty-free imported parts received for job work could be re-exported even though the foreign supplier no longer required the work and some of the goods had already been used in manufacture of sub-assemblies. Although the specific notification condition for re-export of defective or unfit materials was not strictly met, the Foreign Trade Policy allowed re-export of imported goods where no import or export restriction applied, and the goods were not shown to be restricted. Re-export could not be denied merely because the goods were partially used, provided the balance goods were properly identified as the same imported goods. The rejection of re-export was therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209530</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>