<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 1082 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209529</link>
    <description>Section 8 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 is read as fixing a Member&#039;s term at five years, extendable by one further five-year term, with an outer age limit of sixty-five years. Section 10A preserves prior service for persons appointed before the amendment, but fresh consideration remains subject to the amended eligibility scheme and the overall ten-year ceiling for Members. Read together, the provisions reflect a legislative intent to cap total tenure at ten years and prevent an interpretation that would allow reappointment beyond that limit. The construction also avoids anomalous results and gives effect to the statute&#039;s plain language.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 May 2025 10:52:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182976" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 1082 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209529</link>
      <description>Section 8 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 is read as fixing a Member&#039;s term at five years, extendable by one further five-year term, with an outer age limit of sixty-five years. Section 10A preserves prior service for persons appointed before the amendment, but fresh consideration remains subject to the amended eligibility scheme and the overall ten-year ceiling for Members. Read together, the provisions reflect a legislative intent to cap total tenure at ten years and prevent an interpretation that would allow reappointment beyond that limit. The construction also avoids anomalous results and gives effect to the statute&#039;s plain language.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209529</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>