https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209505 The Court dismissed the review applications, emphasizing that the interim order was passed after due consideration of relevant materials. It required the opponent/petitioner to furnish a bond for the disputed amount to protect revenue interests. The Court directed compliance with the order and warned of potential contempt proceedings for non-compliance, scheduling further hearings for the main petitions on 27th October 2010. en-us Thu, 21 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 Jul 2013 10:18:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209505 The Court dismissed the review applications, emphasizing that the interim order was passed after due consideration of relevant materials. It required the opponent/petitioner to furnish a bond for the disputed amount to protect revenue interests. The Court directed compliance with the order and warned of potential contempt proceedings for non-compliance, scheduling further hearings for the main petitions on 27th October 2010. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 21 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209505