<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 1159 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209504</link>
    <description>Excise duty on petroleum products transferred through pipeline turned on whether transit gains could be set off against transit losses under the governing circulars. The court accepted that, where such adjustment is permissible and the combined result remains within the prescribed limit, the loss is to be assessed on the net basis rather than product-wise alone. On that footing, insistence on pre-deposit was not justified, and the orders refusing complete waiver were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2013 17:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182951" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 1159 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209504</link>
      <description>Excise duty on petroleum products transferred through pipeline turned on whether transit gains could be set off against transit losses under the governing circulars. The court accepted that, where such adjustment is permissible and the combined result remains within the prescribed limit, the loss is to be assessed on the net basis rather than product-wise alone. On that footing, insistence on pre-deposit was not justified, and the orders refusing complete waiver were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209504</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>