<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 1078 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209501</link>
    <description>The Court emphasized transparency and fairness in adjudication, ruling that all documents used by the Adjudicator must be provided to the petitioner. The previous order was nullified, allowing the petitioner to request copies of documents used. The writ petition was disposed of with outlined directions, no costs awarded, and orders provided to respective counsels. Fairness and transparency in the adjudication process were highlighted as crucial principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2013 10:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182948" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 1078 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209501</link>
      <description>The Court emphasized transparency and fairness in adjudication, ruling that all documents used by the Adjudicator must be provided to the petitioner. The previous order was nullified, allowing the petitioner to request copies of documents used. The writ petition was disposed of with outlined directions, no costs awarded, and orders provided to respective counsels. Fairness and transparency in the adjudication process were highlighted as crucial principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209501</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>