<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1277 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209491</link>
    <description>Preferential import exemption depended on whether the marble slabs were sufficiently processed in the exporting Contracting Party and whether the final manufacturing process occurred there. The record showed machinery and processing facilities in Sri Lanka, together with a detailed account of the polishing process undertaken there, supporting classification as polished marble slabs. Revenue&#039;s reliance on a statement about further polishing for use and on visual inspection was not backed by technical or trade opinion, and the record did not show that any post-import activity by the importer amounted to polishing. The goods were therefore treated as polished marble slabs eligible for the notification, and denial of exemption was unjustified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2013 12:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182938" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1277 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209491</link>
      <description>Preferential import exemption depended on whether the marble slabs were sufficiently processed in the exporting Contracting Party and whether the final manufacturing process occurred there. The record showed machinery and processing facilities in Sri Lanka, together with a detailed account of the polishing process undertaken there, supporting classification as polished marble slabs. Revenue&#039;s reliance on a statement about further polishing for use and on visual inspection was not backed by technical or trade opinion, and the record did not show that any post-import activity by the importer amounted to polishing. The goods were therefore treated as polished marble slabs eligible for the notification, and denial of exemption was unjustified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209491</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>