<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1268 - CESTAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209475</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted a stay on all demands made by the impugned order and remitted the matter to the original authority for reconsideration based on more acceptable principles. A new method for determining the value of the imported goods was suggested, involving basing the value on the Appellant&#039;s sales of zinc ingots and zinc sulphate, determining the percentage of metallic zinc and zinc in other forms from manufacturing records, and ensuring the calculated value does not fall below the declared value at the time of import. The Appellant agreed to provide necessary data for verification and pay any differential duty. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2013 16:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182922" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1268 - CESTAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209475</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted a stay on all demands made by the impugned order and remitted the matter to the original authority for reconsideration based on more acceptable principles. A new method for determining the value of the imported goods was suggested, involving basing the value on the Appellant&#039;s sales of zinc ingots and zinc sulphate, determining the percentage of metallic zinc and zinc in other forms from manufacturing records, and ensuring the calculated value does not fall below the declared value at the time of import. The Appellant agreed to provide necessary data for verification and pay any differential duty. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209475</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>