<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 1146 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209473</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner due to the failure to properly communicate the penalty order, emphasizing the importance of adhering to principles of natural justice in penalty imposition under the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992. The petitioner was granted the opportunity to appeal the penalty order within the specified time frame, with instructions for further actions based on the appeal outcome.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2013 16:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182920" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 1146 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209473</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner due to the failure to properly communicate the penalty order, emphasizing the importance of adhering to principles of natural justice in penalty imposition under the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992. The petitioner was granted the opportunity to appeal the penalty order within the specified time frame, with instructions for further actions based on the appeal outcome.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209473</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>