<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 1072 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209471</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the petitions, upholding the Engineering Export Promotion Council&#039;s (EEPC) refusal to clear the claims due to incomplete documentation provided by the Petitioners. The Court emphasized that the EEPC&#039;s actions were justified as the verification process required complete documentation as per the International Price Reimbursement Scheme (IPR Scheme). The petitions were found to lack merit and were dismissed without any costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2013 10:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182918" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 1072 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209471</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the petitions, upholding the Engineering Export Promotion Council&#039;s (EEPC) refusal to clear the claims due to incomplete documentation provided by the Petitioners. The Court emphasized that the EEPC&#039;s actions were justified as the verification process required complete documentation as per the International Price Reimbursement Scheme (IPR Scheme). The petitions were found to lack merit and were dismissed without any costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209471</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>