<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1265 - Andhra Pradesh High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209464</link>
    <description>An agricultural market committee constituted as a body corporate is a &quot;person&quot; under the Income-tax Act. Withdrawal of exemption under section 10(20) and deletion of section 10(29) do not bar such a committee from seeking registration under sections 12A/12AA, because the exemption regime for charitable institutions operates separately. The committee&#039;s statutory functions of regulating markets, protecting producers, providing infrastructure and ensuring fair prices were held to serve an object of general public utility, so its activities constitute a charitable purpose. Apprehended non-compliance with section 11(5) cannot justify refusal of registration at the threshold stage, where the authority must examine the genuineness of the institution and its objects.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2013 10:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182912" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1265 - Andhra Pradesh High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209464</link>
      <description>An agricultural market committee constituted as a body corporate is a &quot;person&quot; under the Income-tax Act. Withdrawal of exemption under section 10(20) and deletion of section 10(29) do not bar such a committee from seeking registration under sections 12A/12AA, because the exemption regime for charitable institutions operates separately. The committee&#039;s statutory functions of regulating markets, protecting producers, providing infrastructure and ensuring fair prices were held to serve an object of general public utility, so its activities constitute a charitable purpose. Apprehended non-compliance with section 11(5) cannot justify refusal of registration at the threshold stage, where the authority must examine the genuineness of the institution and its objects.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209464</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>