<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 1136 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209447</link>
    <description>An appeal against an interim order was found not maintainable because the substantive order challenged in the connected proceedings had already been recalled and had ceased to exist. The court treated the underlying dispute as infructuous, so the interim order could not independently survive or sustain the challenge. On that basis, the revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2013 12:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182896" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 1136 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209447</link>
      <description>An appeal against an interim order was found not maintainable because the substantive order challenged in the connected proceedings had already been recalled and had ceased to exist. The court treated the underlying dispute as infructuous, so the interim order could not independently survive or sustain the challenge. On that basis, the revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209447</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>