<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 1128 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209438</link>
    <description>The court quashed the assessment order due to violations of natural justice, directing the revenue to provide documents to the assessee and complete reassessment within six weeks. The assessee was required to deposit Rs. 1.5 crores for interim protection of revenue interests pending the reassessment outcome. The court emphasized fair hearing principles, including giving the assessee an opportunity to respond to reports and prove the genuineness of transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Jul 2013 10:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182887" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 1128 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209438</link>
      <description>The court quashed the assessment order due to violations of natural justice, directing the revenue to provide documents to the assessee and complete reassessment within six weeks. The assessee was required to deposit Rs. 1.5 crores for interim protection of revenue interests pending the reassessment outcome. The court emphasized fair hearing principles, including giving the assessee an opportunity to respond to reports and prove the genuineness of transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209438</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>